The effect of sports shoes on flat foot

Keywords: Branch, sports, flat foot, pes planus, sports shoes

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the effects of participation in sports on the structural deformities of the foot. Methods: A total of 2013 athletes (1301 males, 712 females) who had regularly participated in sports for a minimum of three years were included in the study. Screening of the sole was performed using a podoscope as it is a reliable and practical device. The structure of the sole was evaluated with the highly valid Staheli index. Results: A significant relationship was detected between the ages of the athletes, years in sport, branch of sports variables and the prevalence of flat foot. However, no significant relationship was found between the athletes’ gender and the prevalence of flat foot. Conclusion: It is thought that the training regimes, the floor on which the sports is performed and the shoes used in sports had effects on flat foot deformity. Based on our results, we assert that redesigning the competition shoes and using sports shoes with arch support during warm-ups, running and other sportive and educational drills outside the routine activities of the sports branch may be beneficial for foot health.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 513 | times, Article PDF |

Author Biographies

M.F. Korkmaz, Istanbul Medeniyet University
dr_mfatih@yahoo.com; Istanbul, Turkey
M. Acak, Inonu University
m.acak@hotmail.com; Malatya, Turkey
S. Duz, Inonu University
serkan.duz@inonu.edu.tr; Malatya, Turkey

References

1. Mauch M, Grau S, Krauss I, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008; 32: 1068- 75.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2008.52

2. Murphy DF, Connolly DA, Beynnon BD. Risk factors for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2003; 37: 13- 29.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.1.13

3. Bolgla LA, Malone TR. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: a biomechanical link to clinical practice. J Athl Train. 2004; 39: 77-82.

4. Rose GK, Welton EA, Marshall T. The diagnosis of flat foot in the child. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985; 67: 71- 8.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.67B1.3968149

5. Staheli LT. Evaluation of planovalgus foot deformities with special reference to the natural history. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1987; 77: 2- 6.
https://doi.org/10.7547/87507315-77-1-2

6. Rao UB, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 2300 children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74: 525- 7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B4.1624509

7. Giallonardo LM. Clinical evaluation of foot and ankle dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1988; 68: 1850- 6.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/68.12.1850

8. Kanatli U, Yetkin H, Bolukbasi S. Evaluation of the transverse metatarsal arch of the foot with gait analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123: 148- 50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-002-0459-7

9. Inui K, Ikoma K, Imai K, Ohashi S, Maki M, Kido M, et al. Examination of the correlation between foot morphology measurements using pedography and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017; 56: 298- 303.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.10.020

10. Uzunca K, Taştekin N, Birtane M. Relationship of pain in adult-type pes planus with radiographic and pedobarographical parameters. [Article in Turkish] Romatizma. 2006; 21: 95-9.

11. Taş S, Ünlüer NÖ, Korkusuz F. Morphological and mechanical properties of plantar fascia and intrinsic foot muscles in individuals with and without flat foot. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018;26:230949901880248.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018802482

12. Rodriguez N, Volpe RG. Clinical diagnosis and assessment of the pediatric pes planovalgus deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010; 27: 43-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.005

13. McPoil TG, Vicenzino B, Cornwall MW, Collins N. Can foot anthropometric measurements predict dynamic plantar surface contact area? J Foot Ankle Res. 2009; 2: 28.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-2-28

14. Yalçın E, Kurtaran A, Akyüz M. Pes Planus: Diagnosis, Etiology and Management. [Article in Turkish] Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci. 2008; 28: 743-53.

15. Guido JA Jr, Werner SL. Lower-extremity ground reaction forces in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 26: 1782-5.
https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31824e1211

16. Hong Y, Wang SJ, Lam WK, Cheung JT. Kinetics of badminton lunges in four directions. J Appl Biomech. 2014; 30: 113-8.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2012-0151

17. Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27: 585-93.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270050701

18. Queen RM, Mall NA, Nunley JA, Chuckpaiwong B. Differences in plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 582-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.010

19. Queen RM, Haynes BB, Hardaker WM, Garrett WE Jr. Forefoot loading during 3 athletic tasks. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 630-6.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506295938

20. Sallis RE, Jones K, Sunshine S, Smith G, Simon L. Comparing sports injuries in men and women. Int J Sports Med. 2001; 22: 420-3.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-16246

21. Ferber R, Davis IM, Williams DS 3rd. Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003; 18: 350-7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00025-1

22. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture. 2002; 15: 282-91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00151-5

23. Lee MS, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Catanzariti AR, Kogler G, Kravitz SR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adult flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005; 44: 78-113.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2004.12.001

24. Crisan S, Zaharia VD, Curta C, Irimia ED. Computer Assisted Optical Podoscope for Orthostatic Measurements. In: Vlad S, Ciupa RV, editors. IFMBE Proceedings: International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology. Berlin: Springer; 2011. P. 226-9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22586-4_48

25. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69: 426-8.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198769030-00014

26. Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture. 2007; 26: 68-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.009

27. Aydog ST, Tetik O, Demirel HA, Doral MN. Differences in sole arch indices in various sports. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39: e5.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.011478

28. Wojtys EM, Ashton-Miller JA, Huston LJ, Moga PJ. The association between athletic training time and the sagittal curvature of the immature spine. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 490-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280040801

29. Nurzynska D, Di Meglio F, Castaldo C, Latino F, Romano V, Miraglia R, et al. Flatfoot in children: anatomy of decision making. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2012; 117: 98-106.

30. Echarri JJ, Forriol F. The development in foot print morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2003; 12: 141-6.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00009957-200303000-00012

31. Kuo Y, Liu YSF. The foot posture index between elite athletic and sedentary college students. Kinesiology. 2017; 49: 202-7.
https://doi.org/10.26582/k.49.2.6

32. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the Foot Posture Index. J Foot Ankle Res. 2008; 1: 6.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-1-6

33. Ezema CI, Abaraogu UO, Okafor GO. Flat foot and associated factors among primary school children: A cross-sectional study. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2014; 32: 13-20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2013.05.001

34. Klingele J, Hoppeler H, Biedert R. Statistical deviations in high-performance athletes. [Article in German] Schweiz Z Sportmed. 1993; 41: 55-62.

35. Matsuda S, Demura S, Kasuga K, Sugiura H. Reliability and Sex Differences in the Foot Pressure Load Balance Test and Its Relationship to Physical Characteristics in Preschool Children. Advances in Physical Education. 2012; 2: 44-8.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2012.22008

36. Zifchock RA, Davis I, Hillstrom H, Song J. The effect of gender, age, and lateral dominance on arch height and arch stiffness. Foot Ankle Int. 2006; 27: 367-72.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070602700509

37. Frey C. Foot health and shoewear for women. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; 372: 32-44.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200003000-00005

38. Hashimoto M, Cheng H, Hirohashi K. Evaluation of the function of the human foot in two different conditions using radiography. J Phys Ther Sci. 2004; 16: 57-64.
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.16.57

39. Sachithanandam V, Joseph B. The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77: 254-7.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.77B2.7706341

40. Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Angel J, Singh D. Tibialis posterior dysfunction as a cause of flatfeet in elderly patients. Foot. 2004; 14: 207-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2004.06.003

41. Gould N. Evaluation of hyperpronation and pes planus in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 181: 37-45.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198312000-00007

42. Zatsiorsky VM. Biodynamics of leg movements in swimming. In: Zatsiorsky VM, editor. Biomechanics in Sports: Performance Enhancement and Injury Prevention. 1st ed. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science Inc; 2000. P. 224-5.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693797
Published
2020-04-30
How to Cite
1.
Korkmaz M, Acak M, Duz S. The effect of sports shoes on flat foot. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(2):64-1. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0203
Section
Articles