Anthropometric evaluation of ratio between extremity length and body length in basketball player adolescents

Keywords: basketball, morphometry, anthropometric, limb

Abstract

Backgrounds and Study Aim: To determine whether the limb length-to-body ratio in young basketball players (15-18 years) is different in comparison to those who do not play basketball, and to contribute to the hypothesis that those with which body type can be more successful in basketball . Materials and Methods: The measurements were performed on 42 individuals (29 boys, 13 girls) who have played basketball for at least three years and 41 individuals (31 boys, 10 girls) who did not play basketball. A standard form was prepared for these measurements and the measurements were made according to this form. The data were summarized using mean and standard deviation values, and their accordance with normal distribution was evaluated with the Shapiro-Wilk test. The t-test was used for evaluating the independent samples. Values of p<0.05 were considered significant. The measurements were performed using a tape measure. Results: As a result of the measurements, the height/fa (forearm) ratio was 7.09 in non-basketball players and 6.71 in basketball players. The height/hl (hand length) ratio was 10.0 in non-basketball players and 9.06 in basketball players. The height /lll (lower limb length) ratio was 1.86 in non-basketball players and 1.73 in basketball players. The height /tl (thigh length) ratio was 3.28 in non-basketball players and 3.41 in basketball players. According to our findings, the ratio of forearm, hand, thigh and leg to body were increased in basketball players. There was no significant difference in terms of gender. Conclusion: Athletes possess anthropological and physiological characteristics specific to the sport in which they participate. In terms of limb length, there was an anthropometric difference between the young population who played basketball and the normal population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 529 | times, Article PDF |

Author Biographies

M.F. Korkmaz, Istanbul Medeniyet University
dr_mfatih@yahoo.com; Istanbul, Turkey
A. Cetin, Inonu University
aymelek.cetin@inonu.edu.tr; Malatya, Turkey
O. Bozduman, Afyonkarahisar State Hospital
omerbozduman@gmail.com; Afyon, Turkey

References

1. Van Gent M, Spamer E. Comparisons of positional groups in terms of anthropometric, rugby-specific skills, physical and motor components among U 13, U 16, U 18, and U 19 elite rugby players. Kinesiology. 2005; 37: 50–63.

2. Round J, Jones D, Honour J, Nevill A. Hormonal factors in the development of differences in strength between boys and girls during adolescence: a longitudinal study. Annals of Human Biology. 1999; 26(1): 49–62.
https://doi.org/10.1080/030144699282976

3. Greene J, McGuine T, Leverson G, Best T. Anthropometric and performance measures for high school basketball players. Journal of Athletic Training. 1988; 33(3): 229–232.

4. Bale P. Anthropometric, body composition and performance variables of young elite female basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 199; 31(2):173–7.

5. Pelin C. Kürkçüoğlu A, Ozener B, Yazici AC. Anthropometric characteristic of young Turkish male athletes. Coll Antropol. 2009; 33(4): 1057–63.

6. Sedeaud A, Marc A, Schipman J, Schaal K, Danial M, Guillaume M, Berthelot G, Toussaint JF. Secular trend: morphology and performance. J Sports Sci. 2014; 32(12):1146–54.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.889841

7. Sedeaud A, Vidalin H, Tafflet M, Marc A, Toussaint JF. Rugby morphologies: “Bigger and taller”, reflects an early directional selection. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 2013; 53(2), 185–191.

8. Gabbett T, Georgieff B. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of Australian junior national, state, and novice volleyball players. J Strength Con Res. 2007; 21(3):902–8.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200708000-00042

9. Bayios IA, Bergeles NK, Apostolidis NG, Noutsos KS, Koskolou MD. Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006; 46(2):271–80.

10. Simenz CJ, Dugan CA, Ebben WP. Strength and conditioning practices of National Basketball Association strength and conditioning coaches. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research/National Strength, Conditioning Association. 2005; 19(3): 495–504.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200508000-00003

11. Yousafzai A, Filteau S, Wirz S, Cole T. Comparison of armspan, arm length and tibia length as predictors of actual height of disabled and nondisabled children in Dharavi, Mumbai, India. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 57: 1230–1234.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601705

12. Snow T, Millard-Stafford M, Rosskopf L. Body composition profile of NFL players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research/National Strength, Conditioning Association. 1998; 12: 146–149.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199808000-00003

13. Sanchez-Munoz C, Sanz D, Zabala M. Anthropometric characteristics, body composition and somatotype of elite junior tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41(11):793–9.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.037119

14. Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristic of elite women rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21(3):875–81.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200708000-00038

15. Gabbett TJ. A comparison of physiological and anthropometric characteristics among playing positions in junior rugby league players. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39(9):675–80.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.018275

16. Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res. 2006; 20(4):740–4.
https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-200611000-00003

17. Karalejic M, Jakovljevic S, Macura M. Anthropometric characteristics and technical skills of 12 and 14 year old basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011; 51(1):103–10.

18. Ackland TR, Schreiner AB, Kerr DA. Absolute size and proportionality characteristics of World Championship female basketball players. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1997; 15(5): 485–490.
https://doi.org/10.1080/026404197367128

19. Hoare DG. Predicting success in junior elite basketball players – The contribution of anthropometic and physiological attributes. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport/Sports Medicine Australia, 2000;3(4): 391–405.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1440-2440(00)80006-7

20. Norton K, Olds T. Morphological evolution of athletes over the 20th century: Causes and consequences. Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.Z.). 2001; 31(11): 763–783.
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131110-00001
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Korkmaz M, Cetin A, Bozduman O. Anthropometric evaluation of ratio between extremity length and body length in basketball player adolescents. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(3):125-8. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0304
Section
Articles