The ways of implementing interactive methods in the educational process of students of higher educational institutions
AbstractPurpose : theoretical basis and practical implementation of interactive methods in the educational process of higher education institutions. Material : еhe study involved 50 students of the Kharkiv humanitarian-pedagogical Academy. Results : ыhowing the possibility of introducing interactive teaching method "Joint project." The theoretical study and practical implementation of the method is the process of inclusion of all students in the joint study group (in the form of small groups) work on mastering the content of teaching material. Also, the presentation of educational options to solve their own problems, discussion of the results of joint activities, making optimal decisions. Conclusions : еhe development of theoretical foundations and practical implementation of an interactive method improved the quality of the educational process of students. This is reflected in the involvement of all students in active joint work on learning. Also provide an opportunity for each student to express their own opinions on those tasks. This increased level of theoretical knowledge of each student.
View Counter: Abstract | 63 | times, Article PDF |
Kalic'ko N. G., O Bida. A., Voloshina G. P. Vikoristannia interaktivnikh tekhnologij navchannia v profesijnij pidgotovci majbutnikh vchiteliv [The use of interactive learning technologies in training future teachers], Kiev, Scientific World, 2003, 138 p.
Goncharova N. N. Aktivnye metody obucheniia kak osnova intensifikacii uchebnogo processa [Active learning methods as a basis for the intensification of the educational process.]. Tendenciyi ta perspektivi suchasnoyi universitets'koyi osviti [Trends and perspectives of modern university education], Donets'k, 2006, p. 391.
Dragniev Iu.V., Iermakov S.S., Chekunov M.V. Informatizaciia vishchoyi fizkul'turnoyi osviti: stan ta perspektivi [Computerization of higher physical education: status and prospects], Lugansk, LNU, 2012, 202 p.
Iermakov Sergii. Nauka v olimpijskom sporte [Science in Olympic Sport], 2005, vol.2, pp. 117-127.
Iermakov S.S. Teoriia i metodika fizichnogo vikhovannia i sportu [Theory and methods of physical education and sport], 2006, vol.3, pp. 89-93.
Pometun O. I. , Pirozhenko L. V. , Kobernik G. I. Interaktivni tekhnologiyi navchannia [Interactive learning technologies], Kiev, Scientific World, 2004, 85 p.
Komar O. A. Nove pokolinnia obiraie interaktivni tekhnologiyi navchannia [The new generation chooses interactive learning technology]. Pidgotovka pedagogichnikh kadriv u vishchikh navchal'nikh zakladakh u konteksti procesiv globalizaciyi [Preparation of teaching staff in higher education institutions in the context of globalization processes], Kiev, Millennium, 2005, 212 p.
Revenko V. V. Didaktichni umovi zastosuvannia interaktivnikh tekhnologij u procesi navchannia majbutnikh uchiteliv gumanitarnikh special'nostej [Didactic conditions of use of interactive technology in teaching future teachers of humanities], Cand. Diss., Krivoy Rog, 2011, 20 p.
Roters T.T. Fiziceskoe vospitanie studentov [Physical Education of Students], 2013, vol.4, pp. 72-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.663624
Surovov A.A. Fiziceskoe vospitanie studentov [Physical Education of Students], 2013, vol.3, pp. 55-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.663627
Pometun O. I. , Pirozhenko L. V. Suchasnij urok [Modern lesson], Kiev, ASK Publ., 2004, 192 p.
Abishova G., Bostanova A., Isaev A. Teaching Practice Using Interactive Methods at the Higher Educational Establishments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014, vol.143, pp. 630-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.450.
Donche V., Van Petegem P. Teacher educators’ conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies. Research Papers in Education. 2011, vol.26(2), pp. 207-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.561979.
Information and communication technologies and real-life learning: new education for the knowledge society. T. Weert, A. Tatnall. New York: Springer, 2005, 285 p.
Jones T. Through the lens of home-educated children: engagement in education. Educational Psychology in Practice. 2013, vol.29(2), pp. 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2012.755614.
Kompaniets Yu.A. Using of innovative methods in physical training of students of higher educational institutions of Ukraine Ministry of Internal Affairs. Pedagogics, psychology, medical-biological problems of physical training and sports, 2013, vol.8, pp. 41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.745783
Okita S.Y., Schwartz D.L. Learning by Teaching Human Pupils and Teachable Agents: The Importance of Recursive Feedback. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2013, vol.22(3), pp. 375-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.807263.
Veselinovska S.S., Zivanovik J., Petrovska S., Gokik M. Interactive learning in programmed teaching of the subject “Based of nature science” at pedagogical faculties in the Republic of Macedonia (ICT tools in Biology education). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010, vol.2(2), pp. 2253-2259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.318.
Ward L.J., Padgett K. Developing a service user facilitated, interactive case study - A reflective and evaluative account of a teaching method. Nurse Education Today. 2012, vol.32(2), pp. 156-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.001.
Wright S., McNeill M., Fry J., Wang J. Teaching teachers to play and teach games. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy. 2005, vol.10(1), pp. 61-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1740898042000334917.
Copyright Holder - Author(s).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: more