Nonverbal communication of young players in team sports

Keywords: Communication, teamwork, nonverbal sensitivity, basketball

Abstract

Background and study aim : Nonverbal communication is always present in sport teams’ competition, on the court and around the court. This paper purpose is to investigate the nonverbal skills in two elite basketball cadet teams. Material and Methods: Pursuing this goal, we applied the PONS test to a group of 38 young basketball players 15 -16-year-old: 20 girls and 18 boys. The teenagers were members of Romanian national cadet teams having at least 3 years up to 7 years of experience playing basketball. The test applied to this sample was The Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity. The test results were statistically analysed aiming to evaluate the nonverbal decoding accuracy of each evaluated athlete and to identify the possible differences between the two teams: boys and girls. Results : There is a statistically significant difference between the two teams in boys’ favor, meaning that the girls have done lower average general scores. In decoding face cues both teams are almost equal, de difference relay on understanding the body movement and attitude. Conclusions: Due the scores obtained by the tested players we can conclude that their nonverbal skills are at high level. Training nonverbal communication potentially enhanced game planning and building into the team a healthy psychological and social environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 890 | times, Article PDF |

Author Biographies

C.L. Pop, Bucharest University of Economic Studies
crispotir@yahoo.com; Bucharest, Romania
M.V. Zamfir, Bucharest University of Economic Studies
crispotir@yahoo.com; Bucharest, Romania

References

1. Tuckman BW, Jensen MAC. Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 1977;2:419–27.
https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404

2. Zamfir MV. Verbal and non-verbal communication in sport environment. Marathon, 2017: 9(1): 99-106.

3. Rata G, Rata BC, Rata M, Mares G, Melinte M. Verbal and nonverbal communication during hammer throw training and competitions. Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport /Science, Movement and Health, 2012; 12(2 Suppl.):370–375.

4. Pop CL, Zamfir MV. Optimazing Communication in Team Sports. Bucuresti: Ed. Pro Universitaria; 2017. (in Roumanian)

5. Mehrabian A. Silent messages. Wadsworth, California: Belmont; 1971.

6. Pop CL. Improving Interpersonal Communication for a Higher Quality of Physical Activities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014; 116(21):4983–4987.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1059

7. Pop CL. Communication in Physical Education and Sport. Bucuresti: Ed. Pro Universitaria; 2014. (in Roumanian)

8. Pop CL. Individual and Collective Levels in Teambuilding through Physical Education. In: Runcan P, Rata G, Gavreliuc A, editors. Applied Social Sciences: Psychology, Physical Education and Social Medicine, Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2013. P. 217–224.

9. Ambady N, LaPlante D, Johnson E. Thin‐slice judgments as a measure of interpersonal sensitivity. In: Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, editors. Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001. P. 89–101.

10. Rosenthal R, Hall JA, DiMatteo MR, Rogers PL, Archer D. Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS Test): 2013 [cited 2019 Aug 22]. Available from: https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/downloads/neu:rx914607j?datastream_id=content

11. Rosenthal R, Archer D, Hall JA, DiMatteo MR, Rogers PL. Measuring sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the pons test. Nonverbal Behavior, Elsevier; 1979, p. 67–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-761350-5.50012-4

12. Janusik LA. Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS): (Rosenthal, Hall, DiMatteo, Rogers, & Archer, 2013). In: Worthington DL, Bodie GD, editors. The Sourcebook of Listening Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017, p. 522–9.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119102991.ch58

13. Gheorghe M, Alina M, Marian ZV, Laurenţiu T. Nonverbal Communication in the Romanian Male and Female Representative Basketball Teams –U16. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014;117:288–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.215

14. Andersen PA. Nonverbal Communication: Forms and Functions. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1999.
15. Rosenthal R, Hall JA, DiMatteo MR, Rogers PL, Archer D. Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.

16. Domagoj Lausic, Selen Razon, Gershon Tenenbaum. Nonverbal sensitivity, verbal communication, and team coordination in tennis doubles. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2015, 13(40): 398–414.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2014.993681

17. Furley P, Schweizer G. Nonverbal communication of confidence in soccer referees: an experimental test of Darwin’s leakage hypothesis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2017. 38: 590–597.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0192

18. Furley P. The Social Synapse in Sports Interpersonal Coordination and Nonverbal Behavior in Sports. Complex Systems in Sport, International Congress. Linking Theory and Practice. 2017; 47–49. [cited 2019 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321331313_The_Social_Synapse_in_Sports_Interpersonal_Coordination_and_Nonverbal_Behavior_in_Sports

19. Bull SJ. Sport Psychology: A Self-help Guide. Ramsbury: Crowood Press; 1999.

20. Sullivan P. Communication differences between male and female team sport athletes. Communication Reports, 2004; 17(2): 121–128.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210409389381
Published
2020-02-28
How to Cite
1.
Pop C, Zamfir M. Nonverbal communication of young players in team sports. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(1):26-9. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0104
Section
Articles