Differences between morphological characteristics and motoric capabilities of physically active and inactive female students





primary school, additional sports activity, anthropological status, morphological characteristics, motoric capabilities


Background: This research was done as continuation of research made previously on male population. The goal of this research is to determine „differences between morphological characteristics and motoric capabilities of physically active and inactive female students “. Methods: Sample of physically inactive female students was made of 54 examinees and sample for active students was made of 52 girls. Average age was 12. All girls were primary school students. Physically inactive students regularly attended PE lessons and active students were involved in training process of basketball, volleyball, football and handball teams. Additional practice was done two times a week for 90 minutes. Morphological space is set by 15 variables and motoric space is set with 24 variables. Results: Statistical difference was determined by T-test on level (p<0.05). Significance given by T-test was checked by calculating Eta coefficient. Such data has differences in Chest Width (.00/.00 and η2=0,33), Weight (.00/.00 and η2=0,34), Stomach Skin Curves (.00/.00 and η2=0,37) and Back Skin Curves (.05/.05 and η2=0,16). Motoric space has differences in: Slalom with Three Medicine Balls (.00/.00 and η2=0.01), Throwing medicine ball from the chest (.00/.00 and η2=0,10), Long Jump (.00/.00 and η2=0,17), Push-ups (.02/.02 and η2=0.05), Sit-and-Reach (.04/.04 and η2=0.00) and 20m low start run (.00/.00 and. η2=0,14). Conclusions: After analysis it can be stated the aim of the research was completed and differences of anthropological status of physically active and inactive female students were determined. Students of age 12 can be recommended additional training activity to positively transform anthropological spaces with no transformation. Research with same or similar variables should be done on different age categories when compared to this one or to analyze quality of influence that specific sports have on transformation in this age category.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

F. Rašidagić, University of Sarajevo

faris.rasidagic@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

N. Nurković, University of Sarajevo

n.nurkovic@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Turković Dž. Imamović, University of Sarajevo

imamovicdzenana@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

- Nurković H. Hadžibulić, University of Sarajevo

1512hana@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

E. Nikšić, University of Sarajevo

elvira.beganovic1982@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

A. Kapo, University of Sarajevo

anida.kapo2@gmail.com; Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina


1. Rašidagić F, Imamović Dž. Differences Between Morphological and Motoric Status of Female Students in Central and Peripheral City Areas. Sport Science. 2018;11(1): 119 –123.

2. Barnett NP, Smoll FL, Smith R. Effects on Enhancing Coach-athlete Relationship on Youth Sport Attrition. The Sport Psychologist. 1992; 6: 111–127.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance. MMWR United States. 2010; 59 (SS-5); 1– 127.

4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Strategies to improve the quality of physical education. [Internet]. 2010 [updated 2019 Feb 10; cited 2019 Sep10]. Available from: Washington: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/pecat/quality_pe.pdf

5. Donovan M, Jones G, Hardman K. Physical Education and Sports. Kinesiology. 2006; 38(1): 16–27.
6. Papalia DE, Olds SW, Feldman RD. A child’s world: Infancy through adolescence. The McGrow Hill Companies. Inc. New York, USA, 1999.

7. Šiljković Ž, Rajić V, Bertić D. Extra-curricular and Activities Outside of School. Educational Science. 2007;9(2): 113–145.

8. Martinčević J. Free Time and Students' Involvement in Extra-curricular Activities Outside of School. Life and School. 2010; 24(56): 19–34.

9. Horga S. Children in Sport and Physical Activity: Match or Mismatch of Needs and Demands. In: Pišot R, Štemberger V, ed. A child in Motion Proceedings, Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 2000. P.24–38.

10. Hills AP, King NA, Armstrong TP. The Contribution of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors to the Growth and Development of Children and Adolescents. Sports Med. 2007; 37(6): 533 – 545.

11. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical activity guidelines advisory committee report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. A1-H14.

12. Batričević D. Discriminatory Analysis of Motoric and Functional Capabilities on Athlete and Non – Athlete Students. Sport Science. 2008; 1: 50–53.

13. Jamner M, Spruijt-Metz D, Bassin S, Cooper D. A Controlled Evaluation of a School-based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity Among Sedentary Adolescent Females: Project FAB. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2000; 34: 279– 289.

14. Šoše H, Rađo I. Kinesiology Measurements. Faculty of Physical Education. Sarajevo; 1998.
15. Drljacic D, Arsic K, Arsic D. Eurofit test battery for the assessment of physical abilities and health fitness in children. PONS - Medicinski Casopis, 2012;9:158–64. (In Bosnian)

16. Mikić B. Sports Testing and Measuring. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Tuzla; 1999.

17. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA; 1988.

18. Kolesarić V, Tomašić-Humer J. Greatness of Impact. Faculty of Philosophy. University of Josip Jurja Strossmayer. Osijek; 2016.

19. Blašković M, Matković B, Matković B. Influence of Physical Activity on Development of Some Basic Motoric Capabilities on Boys. Kineziology. 1993; 25(1-2): 33 – 38.

20. Kondrić M, Mišigoj-Duraković M, Metikoš D. Contribution to knowledge of the relation of morphological and motor features 7-19-year students. Kinesiology, 2002; 34(1), 5–14.

21. Bavčević T, Vlahović L, Božinović-Mađor S. Structure of Morphological Space on 6-year-old and 7-year-old Students. 15th Summer School of Kineziologists in Republic of Croatia. 2017. P. 67–72.

22. Brustad RJ, Babkes ML, Smith AL. Youth in sport: Psychological considerations. Handbook of sport psychology, 2001; 2, 604–635.

23. Kapo S, Čaušević D, Doder I, Kapo A, Gurda E, Kapo N, Čuljević A, Fočo R, Bandić M, Čović N. Effects of Physical Education Classes On Body Composition and Muscular Fitness in Primary School Children. Acta Kinesiologica. 2018;12(2): 51–56.

24. Prahović M, Protić J. Differences in Anthropological Characteristics Between 14-year-old Players of Football, Basketball and Handball and Non – Athletes. In: Vladimir Findak, ed. Anthropological, Methodical, Methodological, Professional Assumptions of Work in the Fields of Sport, Sport Recreation and Kineziotherapy. Zagreb: Croatian Association of Kinesiology, 2007; 16. P. 470–476.

25. Kruschitz R, Wallner-Liebmann SJ, Hamlin MJ, Moser M, Ludvik B, Schnedl WJ, Tafeit E. Detecting body fat–a weighty problem BMI versus subcutaneous fat patterns in athletes and non-athletes. PLoS One, 2013; 8(8), e72002.

26. Čoh M. Methodology and Diagnosis of Jump Development in Conditional Training of Athletes. Summary of International Science Summit. Conditional Training of Athletes. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb and Association of Conditional Trainers in Croatia; 2004. P.104 – 118.

27. Bajrić O, Bašinac I, Srdić V, Bajrić S. Factorial Structure of Morphological and Motoric Space on Athlete and Non – Athlete Students. Summary of Works - Proceedings, Sixth International Conference ''Sports Science and Health“. Pan European University, Banja Luka; 2016. P. 132 – 141.

28. Đukić B, Kalentić Ţ, Vujkov N, Vujanović S, Smajić M. Differences in Explosive Strength of Legs and Speed of Separate Movements of Tennis and Table Tennis Players. Biberović A, ed. Summary of Works „7th International Symposium, Sports and Health”. Tuzla: Faculty of Sports and Physical Education, University of Tuzla; 2014. P. 76–79.

29. Vrbik I, Čižmek A, Peršun J. Funkcionalne sposobnosti učenika u osnovnoj školi [Functional abilities of elementary school students]. Zbornik radova Tjelesna i zdravstvena kultura, 2011;21: 512–519. (In Croatian)

30. Bojić A, Šljivić E, Dedić V, Bojić S, Dautović A. Differences in Skeleton Dimensions and Motoric Capabilities of Students in Rural and Urban Areas in Tuzla Canton. Sixth International Conference ''Sports Science and Health “, 2016; 1:21 – 28.

31. Gojković G. Effects of Physical Education on the Morphological Characteristics and Postural Status of Children. Courier of Serbia's Anthropological Society, 2009; 44:171-177.




How to Cite

Rašidagić F, Nurković N, Imamović TD, Hadžibulić -NH, Nikšić E, Kapo A. Differences between morphological characteristics and motoric capabilities of physically active and inactive female students. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(1):30-5. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2020.0105

Abstract views: 543 / PDF downloads: 399