Correlation relation between professional qualifications of physical education teachers and students’ attitudes towards Physical Education classes

Keywords: physical education, secondary school students, teachers’ role in education, professional qualifications


Purpose: This empirical study investigated the impact of the professional qualifications of Physical Education (PE) teachers on secondary school students’ attitudes towards their PE classes. Education in general and teaching and learning in particular are multidimensional phenomena and thus it is essential to determine and define these dimensions to sustain quality in education. From the psychological perspective, along with various factors, teachers’ personality and qualifications may affect students’ learning process. In this respect, effective teachers can foster students’ learning process and help develop positive attitudes towards a course. Material: In order to fulfill the research aim, the data were elicited through a questionnaire from five hundred and ninety-two secondary school students from grades 9, 10 and 11in North Cyprus to be analyzed quantitatively. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and Shapiro-Wilk Testwere run to test normality. Seeing that the data set was not well-modeled by a normal distribution, a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was run to measure the association between the variables. Results: A very strong positive correlation was found between the professional qualifications of teachers and the participants’ attitudes towards PE classes. Conclusions: The results indicated that there was a significant relationship between the qualifications of the teachers and the students’ attitudes towards PE classes. More specifically, it was found that the higher the perceptions of students of the professional qualifications of PE teachers, the more positive attitudes they developed towards PE classes.


Download data is not yet available.

View Counter: Abstract | 544 | times, Article PDF |

Author Biographies

E. Sucuoglu, Near East University; Nicosia, Turkey
H. Atamturk, Near East University; Nicosia, Turkey


1. İnceoglu M. Tutum, algı, iletişim [Attitude, Perception, Communication]. Ankara: Kesit Tanıtım Ltd.; 2004. (In Turkish)

2. Franzoi SL. Social psychology. Third Edition. Boston: Mc. Graw Hill; 2003.

3. Subramaniam PR, Silverman S. Middle school students’ attitudes toward physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2007; 23, 602–611.

4. Mercier K, Silverman S. High school students' attitudes toward fitness testing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2014; 33(2): 269–281.–0153

5. Phillips SR, Silverman S. Development of an instrument to assess fourth and fifth grade students' attitudes toward physical education. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2012; 16(4): 316–327.

6. Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Pinter Publishers; 1992.

7. Gonzàlez VE. On human attitude: Root metaphors in theoretical conceptions. Goteborg, Sweden: Universitas Regia Gothoburgensis; 1992.

8. Mohsin SM. Attitude: Concept, formation and change. New Delhi, India: Wiley; 1990.

9. Donovan C, Mercier K, Phillips S. Investigating attitudes toward physical education: Validation across two instruments. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2015; 19, 91–98.

10. Dismore H, Bailey R. Fun and enjoyment in physical education: Young people's attitudes. Research Papers in Education. 2011; 26 (4): 499–516.

11. Hashim H, Grove JR, Whipp P. Validating the youth sport enjoyment construct in high school Physical Education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2008; 79 (2): 183–195.

12. Hashim HA, Grove JR, Whipp P. Relationships between physical education enjoyment processes, physical activity and exercise habit strength among Western Australian high school students. Asian Journal of Exercise & Sports Science. 2008; 5 (1): 23–30.

13. Subramaniam PR, Silverman S. Validation of scores from an ınstrument assessing student attitude toward physical education. Meas Physical Educ Excer Sci. 2000; 4: 29–43.

14. Subramaniam PR, Silverman S. Using complimentary data: An investigation of student attitude in physical education. Journal of Sport Pedagogy. 2002; 8(1): 74–79.

15. Figley GE. Determinants of attitudes toward physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1985; 4:229–240.

16. Chung MH, Phillips DA. The relationship between attitude toward physical education and leisure-time exercise in high school students. Phys Educ. 2002; 59(3): 125–138.

17. Hicks LL. Attitudes toward physical education and physical activity of students enrolled in the classes of teachers of the year. PhD [dissertation] Purdue University, West Lafayette; 2004.

18. Balyan M, Yerlikaya BK, Kiremitci O. Farklı sportif etkinliklerin ilköğretim 2. kademe öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi dersine yönelik tutum, sosyal beceri ve özyeterlik düzeylerine etkileri [Effects of various sports activities on the social skills, self efficacy and attitudes of 2. grade primary school students towards PE classes]. Selçuk Universitesi Beden Egitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012; 14(2): 196–201. (In Turkish)

19. Jaureguy CD. 6th grade elementary student’s attitudes towards running activities in physical education: a preliminary study. MA [dissertation] California State University, Sacramento; 2013.

20. Yaylacı F. İlköğretim okullarında Nasıl bir beden eğitimi dersi istiyorum? [What kind of a PE class is desired in primary schools?]. Milli Eğitim. 2012; 195: 194–210. (In Turkish)

21. Gushart JL, Kelly IM, Rink JE. The validity of the qualitative measures of teaching performance scale as a measure of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1997; 16 (2):196–210.

22. Rink JE. Effective instruction in physical education. In: S Silverman, C Ennis (Eds.), Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction (2nd ed., 165–186). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2003.

23. Silverman S, Subramaniam PR. Student attitude toward physical education and physical activity: a rewiev of measurement issues and outcomes. J Teach Phys Educ. 1999; 19 (1): 97–125.

24. Elliot DL, Atencio M, Campbell T, Jess M. From PE experiences to PE teaching practices? Insights from Scottish primary teachers' experiences of PE, teacher education, school entry and professional development. Sport, Education and Society. 2013; 18 (6): 749–766.

25. Dowling F. Are PE teacher identities fit for postmodern schools or are they clinging to modernist notions of professionalism? A case study of Norwegian PE teacher students’ emerging professional identities. Sport, Education and Society. 2011; 16 (2): 201–222.

26. Backman E. What is valued in friluftsliv within PE teacher education?—Swedish PE teacher educators’ thoughts about friluftsliv analysed through the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu. Sport, Education and Society. 2008; 13 (1): 61–76.

27. Svendsen AM. A mountain too high to climb? An exploratory study of perceived barriers to mobilisation of research literature into physical education teacher education experienced by a group of Danish PE teacher educators. Sport, Education and Society. 2019:1–13.

28. Gullu M, Guçlu M. Ortaogretim ogrencileri icin beden egitimi dersi tutum olcegi gelistirilmesi [Development of an attitudinal scale for PE classes in secondary schools]. Nigde Universitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009; 3(2):138–151. (In Turkish)
How to Cite
Sucuoglu E, Atamturk H. Correlation relation between professional qualifications of physical education teachers and students’ attitudes towards Physical Education classes. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(1):44-7.