Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Colombian Physical Education students in the practicum




pedagogical content knowledge, physical education, practicum, teachers, training, measurement instrument


Background and Study Aim. In the training of Physical Education teachers, the practicum is considered a final stage of the training.  The practicum implies an amalgamation and connection of the different knowledge acquired at the University and that, when contrasted with the real classroom practice, plays a fundamental role in the future professional development. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a questionnaire to measure the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of the Physical Education teacher trainee in the context of the practicum. Material and Methods. The participants were 146 practicum students of the Bachelor's degree program in Physical Education from four Colombian universities (115 men, 31 women, with an average age of 25.7 + 5.2 years). A non-experimental descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases, the first one: content validity and the second phase related to the analysis of psychometric properties. Results. A Content Validity Ratio of .92 was presented, which indicates a very high content validity based on Lawshe's model and with a sample of 10 expert judges in the field. In the exploratory factor analysis by the principal component analysis method and varimax rotation, 7 dimensions were proposed, with 36 items explaining 66.78 of the total variance of the instrument. The internal consistency was very satisfactory (α=.9). Conclusions. The questionnaire provides a valid, trustable, and specific instrument, which allows identifying the knowledge that a Physical Education practice student has about pedagogy, context, evaluation, teaching strategies, students, experience, and content. Furthermore, understanding this type of knowledge is a precondition that can allow improving the curricular designs of Physical Education degree programs.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Noelva E. Montoya, Universidad de San Buenaventura; Faculty of Education, Universidad de San Buenaventura; Medellín, Colombia.

Alejandro A. Almonacid-Fierro, Universidad Católica del Maule

PhD;; Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica del Maule; Talca, Chile.

Dora I. Arroyave Giraldo, Universidad de San Buenaventura

PhD;; Faculty of Education, Universidad de San Buenaventura; Medellín, Colombia.

Karla B. Valdebenito González, Universidad Católica del Maule; Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica del Maule; Talca, Chile.


1. Dervent F, Ward P, Devrilmez E, Tsuda E. Transfer of Content Development Across Practica in Physical Education Teacher Education. J Teach Phys Educ, 2018;37(4):330–9.

2. Fuentes-Abeledo EJ, González-Sanmamed M, Muñoz-Carril PC, Veiga-Rio EJ. Teacher training and learning to teach: an analysis of tasks in the practicum. Eur J Teach Educ, 2020;43(3):333–51.

3. Vo KAT, Pang V, Lee KW. Teaching practicum of an English teacher education program in Vietnam: from expectations to reality. J Nusant Stud, 2018;3(2):32.

4. Arasomwan DA, Mashiya N. Foundation phase pre-service teachers’ experiences of teaching life skills during teaching practice. South African J Child Educ, 2021;11(1):1–10.

5. Greve S, Weber KE, Brandes B, Maier J. Development of pre-service teachers’ teaching performance in physical education during a long-term internship: Analysis of classroom videos using the Classroom Assessment Scoring System K‑3. Ger J Exerc Sport Res, 2020;50(3):343–53.

6. Lucero E, Roncancio-Castellanos K. The pedagogical practicum journey towards becoming an english language teacher. Profile Issues Teach Prof Dev, 2019;21(1):173–85.

7. Canning R. Reflecting on the reflective practitioner : vocational initial teacher education in Scotland education in Scotland. J Vocat Educ Train, 2011;63(4):609–17.

8. Flores MA. Practice, theory and research in initial teacher education: international perspectives. Eur J Teach Educ, 2017;40(3):287–90.

9. Izadinia M. Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship: do they match or clash? Prof Dev Educ, 2016;42(3):387–402.

10. Le Cornu R. Key components of effective professional experience in initial teacher education in Australia. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership; 2015.

11. Gess-Newsome J, Taylor JA, Carlson J, Gardner AL, Wilson CD, Stuhlsatz MA. Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. Int J Sci Educ, 2019;41(7):944–63.

12. Koh JHL. PACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educ Technol Res Dev, 2019;67(3):577–95.

13. Köksal D, Genç G. Learning while teaching: Student teachers’ reflections on their teaching practicum. J Lang Linguist Stud, 2019;15(3):895–913.

14. Loughran J. Pedagogical reasoning: the foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teach Teach Theory Pract, 2019;25(5):523–35.

15. White S, Forgasz R. The practicum: The place of experience? In: International handbook of teacher education. Springer; 2016. p. 231–66.

16. Isse SF, Neto VM. Supervised internship in the training of Physical Education teachers: Scientific publications on the subject. J Phys Educ, 2016;27(1):1–15.

17. Almonacid Fierro AA, Merellano-Navarro E, Feu Molina S, Vizuete Carrizosa M, Orellana Fernández R. Perspectiva cualitativa en la construcción del conocimiento didáctico del contenido del profesorado de Educación Física [Qualitative perspective in the construction of didactic content knowledge in Physical Education teachers]. Retos, 2019;(36):459–68.

18. Iserbyt P, Ward P, Li W. Effects of improved content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge and student performance in physical education. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog, 2015;22(1):71–88.

19. Kim I. Preservice teachers’ enacted pedagogical content knowledge as a function of content knowledge in teaching elementary physical education content. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog, 2020;26(6):649–61.

20. Ward P, Chen YJ, Higginson K, Xie X. Teaching Rehearsals and Repeated Teaching: Practice-based Physical Education Teacher Education Pedagogies. J Phys Educ Recreat Danc, 2018;89(6):20–5.

21. Shulman LS. Knowlegde and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev, 1987;57(1):1–21.

22. Shulman LS. Research on teaching: a historical and personal perspective. In: The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2004. P. 364–81.

23. Shulman LS. Those who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. J Educ, 2013;193(3):1–11.

24. Abell SK. Twenty Years Later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? Int J Sci Educ, 2008;30(10):1405–16.

25. Berry A, Depaepe F, Driel J V. Pedagogical content knowledge in teacher education. In: Loughran J, Hamilton ML, editors. International handbook of teacher education. Springer; 2016. P. 347–86.

26. Deng Z. Pedagogical content knowledge reconceived: Bringing curriculum thinking into the conversation on teachers’ content knowledge. Teach Teach Educ, 2018;72:155–64.

27. Kind V, Chan KKH. Resolving the amalgam: connecting pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge. Int J Sci Educ, 2019;41(7):964–78.

28. Kleickmann T, Richter D, Kunter M, Jürgen E, Michael B, Krauss S, et al. Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education. J Teach Educ, 2012;64(1):90–106.

29. Chan KKH, Hume A. Towards a Consensus Model: Literature Review of How Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Is Investigated in Empirical Studies. In: Hume A, Cooper R, Borowski A, editors. Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science. Springer; 2019. P. 3–76.

30. Kim I, Ward P, Sinelnikov O, Ko B, Iserbyt P, Li W, et al. The influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: An evidence-based practice for physical education. J Teach Phys Educ, 2018;37(2):133–43.

31. Nilsson P. Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. Int J Sci Educ, 2008;30(10):1281–99.

32. Kahts-Kramer SA, Baard ML. Eastern Cape teachers’ perceptions of their pedagogical content knowledge in Physical Education. African J Phys Act Heal Sci, 2020;26(Sup1):143–58.

33. Meier S. Pedagogical content knowledge in students majoring in physical education vs. sport science. The same but different? Ger J Exerc Sport Res, 2021;51(3):269–76.

34. González Sanmamed M, Fuentes Abeledo EJ. El practicum en el aprendizaje de la profesión docente [The practicum in learning the teaching profession]. Rev Educ, 2011;(354):47–70.

35. Parrott JA. Elementary Physical Education teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of overhand throwing. Old Dominion University; 2016.

36. Reuker S. The knowledge-based reasoning of physical education teachers : A comparison between groups with different expertise. Eur Phys Educ Rev, 2017;23(1):3–24.

37. Romar JE, Ferry M. The influence of a methods course in physical education on preservice classroom teachers’ acquisition of practical knowledge. J Teach Phys Educ, 2020;39(3):374–83.

38. Aydin S, Demirdogen B, Nur Akin F, Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci E, Tarkin A. The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teach Teach Educ, 2015;46:37–50.

39. Tryfos P. Sampling methods for applied research: text and cases. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1996.

40. Ministry of Health of Colombia. Resolución número 8430 de 1993. Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud [Resolution number 8430 of 1993. Whereby the scientific, technical and administrative standards for health research are established]. Bogotá: Diario Oficial; 1993.

41. General Assembly of the World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent, 2014;81(3):14–18.

42. Thompson CB, Panacek EA. Research study designs: Non-experimental. Air Med J, 2007;26(1):18–22.

43. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research Methods in Education. Oxford, UK: Routledge Publishers; 2000.

44. Bessa C, Hastie P, Rosado A, Mesquita I. Original Article Dispositions for learning in Sport Education Questionnaire - ( DFL-SE ). J Phys Educ Sport, 2022;22(5):1277–88.

45. Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA. Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev, 2012;45(3):197–210.

46. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 7a ed. Pearson; 2019.
47. Alabdulkarim L. Development and validation of an Arabic pediatric sensorimotor development test. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2022;9(1):36–40.

48. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1951;16:297–334.

49. Newman M, Gough D. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives ans Application. In: Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M, Bedenlier S, Bond M, Buntins K, editors. Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2020. P. 3–22.

50. Divayana DGH, Suyasa PWA, Adiarta A. Content validity determination of the countenance-tri kaya parisudha model evaluation instruments using lawshe’s CVR formula. J Phys Conf Ser, 2020;1516(1):1–6.

51. López Berlanga MC, Ortiz Jiménez L, Sánchez Romero C. Construction of Questionnaire-Scale USOTIC “Social Networks in Primary and Secondary School Students: Use and Digital Coexistence.” Educ Sci, 2022;12:155.

52. Field AP. Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.

53. Arifin WN. Análisis factorial exploratorio y alfa de Cronbach. Tenue, 2017;1(150):1–22.

54. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes Cronbach´s alpha. Bmj, 1997;314(7080):314–572.

55. Fernandez C. Revisitando a Base De Conhecimentos E O Conhecimento Pedagógico Do Conteúdo (Pck) De Professores De Ciências. Ens Pesqui em Educ em Ciências, 2015;17(2):500–28.

56. Meier S. An Investigation of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge across German Preservice (Physical Education) Teachers. Adv Phys Educ, 2021;11(03):340–52.

57. Almonacid-Fierro A, Souza de Carvalho R, Castillo-Retamal F, Almonacid Fierro M. The practicum in times of Covid-19: Knowledge developed by future physical education teachers in virtual modality. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res, 2021;20(3):68–83.

58. Ayala-Villamil LA, Aristizábal Fúquene A. Saberes que movilizan los docentes de biología en el temprano ejercicio profesional [Knowledge mobilized by biology teachers in their early professional practice]. Rev currículum y Form del Profr, 2022;26(1):395–415.

59. Melo L, Cardona G, Cañada F, Martínez G. Conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre el principio de Arquímedes en un programa de formación de profesores de Física en Colombia [Knowledge mobilized by biology teachers in their early professional practice]. Rev Mex Investig Educ, 2018;23(76):253–79.

60. Burbano Pantoja VM, Valdivieso Miranda MA, Busbano Valdivieso ÁS. El conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre probabilidad en profesores de matemáticas de la educación básica secundaria colombiana [The didactic knowledge of probability content in mathematics teachers of Colombian secondary basic education]. Espacios, 2020;41(37):112–25.

61. Parga-Lozano DL, Moreno-Torres WF. Conocimiento didáctico del contenido en química orgánica: Estudio de caso de un profesor universitario [Didactic content knowledge in organic chemistry: case study of a university professor]. Rev Electron Educ, 2017;21(3):1–21.

62. Gess-Newsome J, Carlson J. The PCK summit consensus model and definition of pedagogical content knowledge. The Symposium Reports from the Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Nicosia; 2013.

63. Gess-Newsome J, Lederman N. Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1999. P.3–17.

64. Grossman P. The Making of a Teacher. Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. Teachers College Press; 1990.

65. Almonacid-Fierro A, Feu S, Vizuete Carrizosa M. Validación de un cuestionario para medir el Conocimiento Didáctico del Contenido en el profesorado de Educación Física [Validation of a questionnaire to measure Didactic Content Knowledge in Physical Education teachers]. Retos, 2018;(34):132–7.

66. Meier S. Development and validation of a testing instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge of German preservice physical education teachers. J Phys Educ Sport, 2020;20(5):3010–6.

67. Da-Silva C, Saavedra García M, Hortigüela-Alcalá D, Corazza M, Izquierdo González D, Barruso O, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to identify the needs detected by the mixed ability rugby environment (Q-NeMAR). J Phys Educ Sport, 2022;22(3):811–9.

68. González Palacio EV, Chaverra Fernández BE, Bustamante Castaño SA, Toro Suaza CA. Diseño y validación de un cuestionario sobre las concepciones y percepción de los estudiantes sobre la evaluación en Educación Física [Design and validation of a questionnaire on students' conceptions and perception of evaluation in Physical Education]. Retos, 2020;(40):317–25.

69. Martínez-Hita FJ, Granero-Gallegos A, Gómez-López M. Diseño y validación de una herramienta para evaluar AICLE en las sesiones de Educación Física [Design and validation of a tool to evaluate CLIL in Physical Education sessions] . Porta Linguarum, 2022;(37):193–210.

70. Kim I, Ko B. Developing Elementary Content Knowledge in Physical Education Teacher Education. Int J Hum Mov Sport Sci, 2016;4(2):13–9.

71. Tsuda E, Ward P, Li Y, Higginson K. Content knowledge acquisition in physical education: Evidence from knowing and performing by majors and Nonmajors. J Teach Phys Educ, 2021;38(3):221–32.

72. Ward P. The role of content knowledge in conceptions of teaching effectiveness in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2013;84:431–40.

73. Ward P, Dervent F, Lee YS, Ko B, Kim I, Tao W. Using Content Maps to Measure Content Development in Physical Education: Validation and Application. J Teach Phys Educ, 2017;36(1):20–31.

74. López Pastor VM, Molina Soria M, Arias CP, Manrique Arribas JC. La importancia de utilizar la Evaluación Formativa y Compartida en la Formación Inicial del Profesorado de Educación Física: los Proyectos de Aprendizaje Tutorado como ejemplo de buena práctica [The importance of using Formative and Shared Assessment in Initial Physical Education Teacher Training: Tutorial Learning Projects as an example of good practice]. Retos, 2020;37:620–7.

75. Amórtegui Cedeño EF, Mosquera JA. La formación de maestros y maestras de ciencias naturales en contextos de aislamiento social: experiencias en la región sur de Colombia [The training of natural science teachers in contexts of social isolation: experiences in the southern region of Colombia]. Memorias SIFORED - encuentros educación UAN, 2021.

76. Ward P, Ayvazo S. Pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptions and findings in physical education. J Teach Phys Educ, 2016;35(3):194–207.




How to Cite

Montoya NE, Almonacid-Fierro AA, Arroyave Giraldo DI, Valdebenito González KB. Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Colombian Physical Education students in the practicum. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2022;26(5):300-1.

Abstract views: 263 / PDF downloads: 158