The influence of the ethno-territorial factor on the state of physical abilities development of students of Ukrainian educational institutions




physical fitness, ethno-territorial factor, population, students


Background and Study Aim. The development of motor skills depends on the process of physical development, as well as the ethno-territorial and cultural context. The study of inter-ethnic differences can provide information about how different lifestyles and contexts of physical activity can influence the process of motor competence development. This can be a real strategy for developing students’ lagging basic motor skills. The purpose of the work is to investigate the ethno-territorial variability of the level of development of physical abilities of students studying at Ukrainian universities. Material and Methods. Data were obtained from cross-sectional surveys from 2014 to 2019. Students of Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University (Ukraine) (young men, n = 488, age 18–25) from different countries were recruited. Pedagogical testing was carried out using a battery of tests that were recommended by the State Tests of Physical Fitness of the Population of Ukraine and the European Sports Council (Evrofit Test Battery). Assessment of physical fitness of students was carried out on the basis of a combined percentage scale of multi-level gradation with a step of 1%. Experimental data were processed using the SPSS Statistics 17.0 program. Results. In almost all countries (with the exception of India and Tunisia), from 41.2% to 70.0% of students are characterized by a low level of development of cardiorespiratory endurance and speed-power fitness (from 54.4% to 58.3%). More than 50.0% of students from Jordan and Egypt have a low level of speed and strength abilities and flexibility. It was found that students from India and Tunisia have the highest rates (endurance - 75.5–80.8%); from China and Tunisia (speed-power abilities - from 69.1% to 78.8%); from Tunisia (speed –79.8%); from China and Tunisia (flexibility -70%); test participants completed the test; from China (power capacity – 76.7%). Students from European countries showed mostly average and above average level of development of physical abilities. Conclusions. The results of the study indicate the specificity of the development of motor skills of students from different countries, which is manifested in statistically significant differences in the results of test tasks. Students from different countries perform better on those tests that are closer to their known motor experience. This is due to the cultural environment, geographical factor, socio-economic status, as well as the content and goals of the physical education program.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Igor Vypasniak, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Culture; Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

Iryna Ivanyshyn, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Culture; Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

Vasyl Lutskii, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Department of Theory and Methods of Physical Culture; Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University; Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine.

Oleksandra Huzak, Uzhorod National University; Department of Physical Rehabilitation, Uzhorod National University; Uzhorod, Ukraine.

Vira Yukhymuk, National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport

;; Department of Health, Fitness and Recreation, National University of Ukraine on Physical Education and Sport, Fizkultury Str, 1, Kyiv, 02000, Ukraine.

Ivan Salatenko, Sumy National Agrarian University; Sumy National Agrarian University; Gerasim Kondratiev str, 160, Sumy, 40021, Ukraine.

Andrii Svatiev, Zaporizhzhia National University; Department of physical culture and sport, Zaporizhzhia National University; Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine.


1. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide Trends in Insufficient Physical Activity from 2001 to 2016: a Pooled Analysis of 358 Population-Based Surveys with 1·9 Million Participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077–e1086.

2. Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, Kahlmeier S, Group LPASW. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380:294–305.

3. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, Group LPASW. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380:247– 57.

4. Mitrović B, Janković R, Dopsaj M, Vučković G, Milojević S, Pantelić S, Nurkić M. How an eight-month period without specialized physical education classes affects the morphological characteristics and motor abilities of students of the Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies. Facta Univ. Phys. Educ. Sport. 2016;14:167–178.

5. Myers J, Kaykha A, George S, Abella J, Zaheer N, Lear S, Froelicher V. Fitness versus physical activity patterns in predicting mortality in men. American Journal of Medicine. 2004;117:912–918. amjmed.2004.06.047

6. Aguilar-Farias N, Martino-Fuentealba P, Carcamo-Oyarzun J, Cortinez-O’Ryan A, Cristi-Montero C, Von Oetinger A, Sadarangani KP. A regional vision of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and physical education in adolescents from Latin America and the Caribbean: results from 26 countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47:976–86.

7. Bann D, Scholes S, Fluharty M. et al. Adolescents’ physical activity: cross-national comparisons of levels, distributions and disparities across 52 countries. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(141).

8. Bergier J, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Bilinski P, Paprzycki P, Wojtyła A. Physical activity of Polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: A population based study. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2012;19:109–115.

9. Tremblay MS, Barnes JD, González SA, Katzmarzyk PT, Onywera VO, Reilly JJ, Tomkinson GR, Team GMR. Global matrix 2.0: report card grades on the physical activity of children and youth comparing 38 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13:S343–66.

10. Van Hecke L, Loyen A, Verloigne M, van der Ploeg HP, Lakerveld J, et al. Variation in population levels of physical activity in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2016;13(1): 70.

11. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

12. Cardinal BJ, Lee JY, Kim YH, Lee H, Li KK, Si Q. Behavioral, demographic, psychosocial, and sociocultural concomitants of stage of change for physical activity behavior in a mixed-culture sample. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2009;23(4):274–278.

13. Graham DJ, Schneider MS, Dickerson SS. Environmental resources moderate the relationship between social support and school sports participation among adolescents: A cross-sectional analysis. International. Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;18: 8–34.

14. Lewis MV, Szabo RA, Weiner KR, McCall L, Piterman L. Cultural barriers to exercise amongst the ethnic elderly. Internet Journal of Health Promotion. 1997;4: 1–7.

15. Yoh T, Yang H, Gordon B. Status of participation in physical activity among international students attending colleges and universities in the United States. College Student Journal. 2008;42:1110–17.

16. WHO. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

17. Shalala DE. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. [Internet]; 2022 Aug 03 [cited 2012 Aug 21]. Available from:

18. Suminski RR, Petosa R, Utter AC, Zhang JJ. Physical activity among ethnically diverse college students. Journal of American College Health. 2002;51(2):75–80.

19. Adeyemi-Walker LJ, Duncan M, Tallis J, Eyre E. Fundamental Motor Skills of Children in Deprived Areas of England: A Focus on Age, Gender and Ethnicity. Children (Basel). 2018;5(8):110.

20. Kljajević V, Stanković M, Đorđević D, Trkulja-Petković D, Jovanović R, Plazibat K, Oršolić M, Čurić M, Sporiš G. Physical Activity and Physical Fitness among University Students-A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19(1):158.

21. Bardid F, Rudd JR, Lenoir M, Polman R, Barnett LM. Cross-cultural comparison of motor competence in children from Australia and Belgium. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2015;6(July):964.

22. Kelly L, O’Connor S, Harrison AJ, Ní Chéilleachair NJ. Does fundamental movement skill proficiency vary by sex, class group or weight status? Evidence from an Irish primary school setting. J Sports Sci [Internet]. 2018; 37(9):1055–63.

23. Niemistö D, Finni T, Haapala E, Cantell M, Korhonen E, Sääkslahti A. Environmental Correlates of Motor Competence in Children—The Skilled Kids Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019;16(11): 1989.

24. D’Hondt E, Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Lenoir M. Motor Competence Levels in Young Children: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Between Belgium and Greece. J Mot Learn Dev [Internet]. 2019; 7(3):289–306.

25. Luz C, Cordovil R, Rodrigues LP, Gao Z, Goodway JD, Sacko RS, et al. Motor competence and health-related fitness in children: A cross-cultural comparison between Portugal and the United States. J Sport Heal Sci. 2019;8(2):130–6.

26. Saccani R, Valentini NC. Cross-cultural analysis of the motor development of Brazilian, Greek and Canadian infants assessed with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Rev Paul Pediatr [Internet]. 2013; 31(3):350–8.

27. Yan JH, McCullagh P. Cultural influence on youth’s motivation of participation in physical activity. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2004;27:378–390.

28. Nobre FSS, Valentini NC, Rusidill ME. Applying the bioecological theory to the study of fundamental motor skills. Phys Educ Sport Pedagog [Internet]. 2020;25(1):29–48.

29. Berleze A, Valentini N. Intervention for Children with Obesity and Overweight and Motor Delays from Low-Income Families: Fostering Engagement, Motor Development, Self-Perceptions, and Playtime. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5):2445.

30. Elgar FJ, Pförtner T-K, Moor I, De Clercq B, Stevens GW, Currie C. Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent health 2002–2010: a time-series analysis of 34 countries participating in the health behaviour in school-aged children study. Lancet. 2015;385:2088–95.

31. Ferreira L, Godinez I, Gabbard C, Vieira JLL, Caçola P. Motor development in school-age children is associated with the home environment including socioeconomic status. Child Care Health Dev [Internet]. 2018; 44(6):801–6.

32. Clennin MN, Demissie Z, Michael SL, Wright C, Silverman S, Chriqui J, et al. Secular Changes in Physical Education Attendance Among U.S. High School Students, 1991–2015. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2018;89(4): 403–410.

33. Duncan MJ, Roscoe CM, Noon M, Clark CC, O’Brien W, Eyre EL. Run, jump, throw and catch: How proficient are children attending English schools at the fundamental motor skills identified as key within the school curriculum? Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2020;26(4):814–26.

34. Yoh T. Motivational attitudes toward participating in physical activity among international students attending colleges in the United States. College Student Journal. 2009;43:931–936.
35. On the approval of tests and standards for persons whose annual assessment of physical fitness conducting on freewill basis. Instructions on the organization and forms of the Report, Order of Ukraine No 4607, dated 04.10.2018. Kyiv; 2018. (In Ukrainian).

36. Gahche J, Fakhouri T, Carroll DD. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels among U.S. youth aged 12–15 years: United States, 1999–2004 and 2012. NCHS data brief, no 153. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2014.

37. Karimi Dabidi Roshan V, Esposito F. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Its Relationship with Health Risk Factors Among University Students: A Comparison Between Iran and Italy. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2020;22(3):e91964.

38. Monteiro de Almeida Antonio Eduardo, Miranda Ferreira Igor Rafael, Macedo SantanderMaria Izabel, ArévaloJoão Campos, Agnaldo do Nascimento Jorge René Garcia, RittKarlyse Luiz Eduardo Fonteles, Pinto Claudino BelliJorge, Stein RibeiroRicardo. Classification System for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Based on a Sample of the Brazilian Population. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2019;32 (4).

39. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7: 40.

40. Turner RW, Perrin EM, Coyne-Beasley T, Peterson CJ, Skinner AC. Reported Sports Participation, Race, Sex, Ethnicity, and Obesity in US Adolescents From NHANES Physical Activity (PAQ_D). Glob Pediatr Health. 2015;2:2333794X15577944.

41. World Health Organization. It's time to walk the talk: WHO independent high-level commission on noncommunicable diseases final report. Geneva; 2019.

42. Rouis M, Attiogbé E, Vandewalle H, Jaafar H, Noakes TD, Driss T. Relationship between vertical jump and maximal power output of legs and arms: effects of ethnicity and sport. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(2):e197-207.

43. Rouis M, Coudrat L, Jaafar H, Attiogbé E, Vandewalle H, Driss T. Effects of ethnicity on the relationship between vertical jump and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. J Hum Kinet. 2016;51:209–16.

44. Caia J, Weiss LW, Chiu LZF, Schilling BK, Paquette MR, Relyea GE. Do lower-body dimensions and body composition explain vertical jump ability? J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016;30:3073–83.

45. Babel K, Hertogh C, Hue O. Influence of ethnic origin on predictive parameters of performance in sprint running in prepubertal boys. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(9):798–802.

46. Walhain F, Declerck M, de Vries J, Veeger HEJ, Ledebt A. Health-related fitness of urban children in Suriname: an ethnic variety. Abstract from CARPHA (Caribbean Agency for Public Health) Health Research Conference. Guyana: Georgetown; 2017.

47. De La Torre Susan. The Effect of age, gender, and ethnic origin on flexibility as measured by the sit and reach test and the Leighton flexometer. [Master's Theses]. San Jose State University; 1992.

48. Kemp BJ, Cliff DP, Chong KH, Parrish AM. Longitudinal changes in domains of physical activity during childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2019; 22: 695–701. 701.

49. Kuan YM, Zuhairi NA, Manan FAbd., Knight VF, Ahmad Padri MN, Omar R. Role of Gender, Age and Ethnicities on Visual Reaction Time and Visual Anticipation Time of Junior Athletes. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 2015; 9(5): 129–134.

50. Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, Léger L, Olds T, Tomkinson GR. International variability in 20 m shuttle run performance in children and youth: who are the fittest from a 50-country comparison? A systematic literature review with pooling of aggregate results. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2018;52(4): 276–276.

51. Woo J, Arai H, Ng TP, Sayer AA, Wong M, Syddall H, et al. Ethnic and geographic variations in muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance measures. European Geriatric Medicine, 2014;5(3): 155–164.

52. Ong HL, Abdin E, Chua BY et al. Hand-grip strength among older adults in Singapore: a comparison with international norms and associative factors. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17: 176.

53. Moy F, Chang E, Kee K. Predictors of handgrip strength among the free living elderly in rural pahang, malaysia. Iran J Public Health. 2011;40:44–53.

54. Silva AM, Shen W, Heo M, Gallagher D, Wang Z, Sardinha LB, et al. Ethnicity‐related skeletal muscle differences across the lifespan. Am J Hum Biol. 2010;22:76–82.

55. McGrath RP, Ottenbacher KJ, Vincent BM, Kraemer WJ, Peterson MD. Muscle weakness and functional limitations in an ethnically diverse sample of older adults. Ethnicity & Health, 2020;25(3): 342–353.

56. Mayson TA, Harris SR, Bachman CL. Gross Motor Development of Asian and European Children on Four Motor Assessments: A Literature Review. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2007;19(2): 148–153.

57. Padmapriya K, Krishna P, Rasu T. Prevalence and patterns of physical activity among medical students in Bangalore, India. Electron. Physician. 2013;5:606–610.

58. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Physical inactivity and associated factors among university students in South Africa. AJPHERD. 2013;19:143–153.

59. Zi Yan, Bradley J. Cardinal Increasing Asian International College Students’ Physical Activity Behavior: A Review of the Youth Physical Activity Promotion. Model Spring. 2013; 45(1): 35–45.

60. Al-Hazzaa HM. Physical Inactivity in Saudi Arabia Revisited: A Systematic Review of Inactivity Prevalence and Perceived Barriers to Active Living. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018;12(6):50–64.

61. Spiteri K, Broom D, Hassan Bekhet A, Xerri de Caro J, Laventure B, Grafton K. Barriers and Motivators of Physical Activity Participation in Middle-Aged and Older Adults-A Systematic Review. J Aging Phys activity. 2019;27(6):929–44.

62. UNESCO. World-wide survey of school physical education. France: UNESCO Publishing; 2014.

63. Ericsson I, Karlsson MK. Motor skills and school performance in children with daily physical education in school – A 9-year intervention study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2014;24: 273–278.

64. Afable-Munsuz A, Ponce NA, Rodriguez M, PerezStable EJ. Immigrant generation and physical activity among Mexican, Chinese & Filipino adults in the US. Social Science & Medicine. 2010;70:1997–2005.




How to Cite

Vypasniak I, Ivanyshyn I, Lutskii V, Huzak O, Yukhymuk V, Salatenko I, Svatiev A. The influence of the ethno-territorial factor on the state of physical abilities development of students of Ukrainian educational institutions. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2022;26(6):415-2.

Abstract views: 203 / PDF downloads: 95