Aquatic gymnastics program to improve kinesthetic manual praxis in children with Down syndrome

Diyana Georgieva; Veselina Ivanova

doi:10.15561/26649837.2023.0406

Authors

Diyana Georgieva Trakia University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-930X
Veselina Ivanova Trakia University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-0967

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2023.0406

Keywords:

praxis function, alternative therapy, water space, Down syndrome

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. An alternative solution to improve the praxis function in children with Down syndrom is the application of modern therapeutic programs that take place in the aquatic environment. The article focuses on a study tracking the effects of a therapeutic program based on water gymnastics resources as an alternative technology to improve kinesthetic manual praxis in individuals with Down syndrome. Material and Methods. Thirty children with Down syndrome (aged between 9 and 11 years) participated in the experiment and were differentiated in equal numbers into two groups: experimental (undergoing an 11-month therapeutic water gymnastics course) and control (taught using traditional technologies). The research battery for tracking the dynamics in the kinesthetic organization of manual movements included three neuropsychological probes with six items each, performed separately by the fingers of both hands. The empirical data were processed according to generally accepted methods of mathematical statistics: a Shapiro-Wilk test for the assumption of normality, descriptive statistics for the dependent variables and an independent samples t- test to verify between-group differences. SPSS 16.0 statistical package was used for statistical analysis, with a level of significance α = 0.05. Results. In the primary phase, the two groups were homogeneous in terms of the initial results of their performance in the area of fine motor movements. In the final phase, a statistically significant difference was identified between the experimental and control groups in the performance of all three probes: Reproduction of finger postures by the visual model (t = 4.053, p<0.001); Reproduction of finger postures by the kinesthetic model (t = 2.973, p<0.01); Transfer of finger postures by the kinesthetic model (t = 2.866, p<0.05). A significant improvement was registered in the experimental group's performance in all components of manual praxis (Δ= 15.70%; Δ= 12.58%; Δ= 10.39%). Conclusions. The positive dynamics in praxis function development within the studied domain serve as clear evidence. These changes in the realization of purposeful, pre-planned manual actions can be generated through a well-structured training and therapy program utilizing the benefits of water gymnastics as an intervention method. This is a sufficiently encouraging fact for children with Down syndrome, given the specific psychomotor profile determined by the genetic pathology.

Author Biographies

Diyana Georgieva, Trakia University

Associate prof.; paskaldi1929@abv.bg; Faculty of Education; Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Veselina Ivanova, Trakia University

Prof.; v_g_chipeva@abv.bg; Faculty of Education; Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

References

Dykens EM, Shah B, Sagun J, Beck T, King BH. Maladaptive behavior in children and adolescents with Down's syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2022;46(6):484–492. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00431.x

Luria AR. Fundamentals of neuropsychology. M: Publishing House MGU;1973.

Kearney K, Gentile AM. Prehension in young children with Down syndrome. Acta Psychologica. 2002;112(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00083-5

Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, D’Hondt E. Motor Competence and its Effect on Positive Developmental Trajectories of Health. Sports Med. 2015;45(9): 1273–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6

Zheleva-Terzieva D. Impact of distance learning on the motor abilities of primary school-aged pupils. Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences. 2021;2:362–365. https://doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.247

Nikolova S. Issues of mental retardation. Shumen: University Publishing House Episkop Konstantin Preslavsky;2015.

Davis WE, Kelso JA. Analysis of invariant characteristics in motor control of Down’s syndrome and normal subjects. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1982;14(3):194–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1982.10735273

Feldman AG. Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (λ model) for motor control. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1986;18(1):17–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1986.10735369

Barney Ch. Reduced pain threshold documented in children with Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(11):988–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12845

Valkenburg AJ, Tibboel D, van Dijk, M. Pain sensitivity of children with Down syndrome and their siblings: quantitative sensory testing versus parental reports. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;(57)11:1049–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12823

Dunst C. Stage transitioning in the sensorimotor development in Downs syndrome infants. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research. 1988;32(5):405–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1988.tb01430.x

Jobling A. Motor development in school-aged children with Down syndrome: a longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 1998;45(3):283–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912980450304

American Occupational Therapy Association practice. Occupational Therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2002b;56:609–639. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.6.609

Fidler DJ, Hodapp RM, Dykens EM. Behavioral phenotypes and special education: Parent report of educational issues for children with Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Williams syndrome. Journal of Special Education. 2002;36(2):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360020301

Sabeva GK. Features of the Traditional Understanding of Mental Retardation and Possible Ways of its Improvement. SocioBrains. 2016;21:100–105. http://sociobrains.com/

Terzieva G. Self-efficacy of preschool and primary school teachers for inclusion of children with special educational needs in motor education. Pedagogy. 2020;92(7):1020–1027.

Aleksandrovic M, Jorgic B, Block M, Jovanovic L. The effects of aquatic activities on physical fitness and aquatic skills in children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Physical Education and Sport. 2015;13(3):351–362.

Grosse SJ. Water freedom for all: the Halliwick method. International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education. 2010;4(2):199–207. https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.04.02.10

Vodakova E, Chatziioannou D, Jesina O, Kudlacek M. The Effect of Halliwick Method on Aquatic Skills of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(23): 16250. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316250

Getz M, Hutzler Y., Vermeer A. Effects of aquatic interventions in children with neuromotor impairments: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2006a;20(11):927–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215506070693

Danneskiold-Samasøe B, Lyngberg K, Risum T, Telling M. The effect of water exercise therapy given to patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020;19(1):31–35. https://doi.org/10.2340/1650197787193135

Fragala-Pinkham M, Dumas H, Barlow C, Pasternak A. An aquatic physical therapy program at a pediatric rehabilitation hospital: A case series. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2009;21(1):68–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e318196eb37

Potop V, Cretu M, Buftea V, Ulăreanu M. (2018). Analysis of the Specific Physical Training Influence on the Technical Execution of Double Salto Backward on the Floor. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2018;18(5):2186–2192. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.s5330

Luria AR. Fundamentals of Neuropsychology. Textbook for students of higher education. M:Аcademy; 2002.

Annett M, Alexander MP. Atypical cerebral dominance: Predictions and tests of the right shift theory. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34(12):1215–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(96)00048-6

Chua R, Weeks DJ, Elliott D. A functional systems approach to understanding verbal-motor integration in individuals with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice. 1996;4(1):25–36. https://doi.org/10.3104/reviews.60

Cowell P, Hugdahl K. Individual differences in neurobehavioral measures of laterality and interhemispheric function as measured by dichotic listening studies. Developmental Neuropsychology. 2000;18(1):95–112. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN1801_6

Fidler D, Hepburn S, Mankin, G, Rogers S. Praxis Skills in Young Children With Down Syndrome, Other Developmental Disabilities, and Typically Developing Children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2005;59(2):129–138. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.59.2.129

Hanslmayr S, Gross J, Klimesch W, Shapiro K. The role of alpha oscilltations in temporal attention. Brain Research Reviews. 2011;67(1-2):331–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2011.04.002