Stroop-based locomotor training improves executive attention and running in preschoolers
Keywords:
executive attention, stroop effect, transitional motor skills, preschool children, cognitive-motor integrationAbstract
Background and Study Aim. Motor training programs that integrate cognitive demands are increasingly used in early childhood education. Approaches based on the Stroop principle combine motor actions with inhibitory control and attentional regulation, which are closely related to executive attention and basic motor skills in preschool children. Despite the application of various cognitively enriched motor tasks, their relative effectiveness in improving executive attention and locomotor performance remains a matter of practical interest. This study investigates the impact of a motor training program derived from the principle of reflection in the Stroop task on executive attention, running, and jumping skills in preschool children. Materials and Methods. A randomized experiment was conducted in two kindergartens. A total of 72 children aged 5–6 years participated and were divided into two groups: experimental and control. The intervention lasted eight weeks with four sessions per week. Children in the experimental group performed running and jumping tasks based on the Stroop principle. Their executive attention was measured using the Day–Night Stroop task. Motor performance was assessed using standardized running and jumping tests. Data normality was verified, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare pre- and post-test results. Results. The experimental group showed a significant improvement in executive attention (p < .01) and running speed (p < .01). However, no significant improvement was observed in the standing long jump test (p = .343) compared with the control group. Effect sizes ranged from moderate to large. In contrast, the control group showed no significant changes in Stroop test performance or jump distance. A moderate improvement in running speed was observed. Conclusions. Motor training can contribute to the enhancement of executive attention and basic motor skills in preschool children. These findings are consistent with embodied cognition research and contribute to the development of innovative educational practices in early childhood.References
Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 2013;64:135–68. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
Zelazo PD, Carlson SM. The neurodevelopment of executive function skills: Implications for academic achievement gaps. Psychol Neurosci 2020;13:273–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000208.
Muir R. Title: Developing Self-regulation and Executive Functions in preschool children-The SOWATT approach. n.d.
Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Ficco L, Tyralla S, Sepehry AA, Aziz-Safaie T, et al. Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies. Neuropsychol Rev 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-024-09647-1.
Hao Y, Kong L, Wang X, Yu X. The impact of structured motor learning intervention on preschool children’s executive functions. Sci Rep 2025;15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01385-5.
Şendil AM, Canlı U, sheeha B Bin, Alkhamees NH, Batrakoulis A, Al-Mhanna SB. The effects of structured coordinative exercise protocol on physical fitness, motor competence and inhibitory control in preschool children. Sci Rep 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79811-3.
Bao R, Wade L, Leahy AA, Owen KB, Hillman CH, Jaakkola T, et al. Associations Between Motor Competence and Executive Functions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Medicine 2024;54:2141–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02040-1.
Mao F, Huang F, Zhao S, Fang Q. Effects of cognitively engaging physical activity interventions on executive function in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2024;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454447.
Wilson AD, Golonka S. Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is. Front Psychol 2013;4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058.
Shapiro L, Stolz SA. Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education 2019;17:19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149.
Jianing W, Qiuyan J, Qi Z, Jie L, Qi S. 中国康复理论与实践 2024 年 1 月第 30 卷第 1 期 Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract 2024;30. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006•9771.2024.01.006.
Kong C, Cai Y, Li K, Wang Z, Wen X, Zhang X. The relationship between fundamental motor skills and executive function in children: a stratified analysis by age and sex. Front Psychol 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1669915.
Veldman SLC, Hammersley ML, Howard SJ, Stanley RM, Okely AD, Jones RA. Associations of gross motor skills with self-regulation and executive function in preschool-aged children. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 2023;48:234–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391231175524.
Basu S. Examining the reliability and validity of computerized stroop test in children aged 5-13 years: a preliminary study. Qual Quant 2023;57:645–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01376-y.
Hommel B, Chapman CS, Cisek P, Neyedli HF, Song JH, Welsh TN. No one knows what attention is. Atten Percept Psychophys 2019;81:2288–303. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01846-w.
Reed CL, Hartley AA. Embodied Attention: Integrating the Body and Senses to Act in the World. Handbook of Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting, Springer International Publishing; 2021, p. 265–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_12.
Ahmed, R., Saleem, S., & Yousafzai, A. (2024). Low-cost cognitive-motor interventions for early childhood development in LMICs: A systematic review. *Early Child Development and Care*. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2024.0000002
Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3½-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition, 53(2), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-X
Ulrich, D. A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development–2 (TGMD-2). Austin, TX: PRO-ED
Field Ssage A. DISCOVERING STATISTICS USING BM SPSS STATISTICS 4TH EDITION. n.d.
Best JR, Miller PH. A Developmental Perspective on Executive Function. Child Dev 2010;81:1641–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x.
Diamond A, Ling DS. Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2016;18:34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.11.005.
Raoof M, Amanpour S, Roghani A, Abbasnejad M, Kooshki R, Askari-Zahabi K, et al. The effects of neonatal maternal deprivation and chronic unpredictable stresses on migraine-like behaviors in adult rats. Neurosci Lett 2022;772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136444.
Song W, Feng L, Wang J, Ma F, Chen J, Qu S, et al. Play Smart, Be Smart? Effect of Cognitively Engaging Physical Activity Interventions on Executive Function among Children 4~12 Years Old: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Brain Sci 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12060762.
Ibrahim A, AL-Badri OFY, Alsamarae MSK. A comparison of motor intelligence and some basic movements according to the time of daily practice of electronic games and watching television for children (4-6) years. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2019;22. https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2019.220927.
Kolovelonis A, Pesce C, Goudas M. The Effects of a Cognitively Challenging Physical Activity Intervention on School Children’s Executive Functions and Motivational Regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912742.
Mcclelland MM, Tominey SL, Schmitt SA, Duncan R. SEL Interventions in Early Childhood. vol. 27. 2017.
Veldman SLC, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM, Gubbels JS. Correlates of screen time in the early years (0–5 years): A systematic review. Prev Med Rep 2023;33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102214.
Vazou S, Mantis C, Luze G, Krogh JS. Self-perceptions and social–emotional classroom engagement following structured physical activity among preschoolers: A feasibility study. J Sport Health Sci 2017;6:241–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.006.
Goodwin J, Lecouturier J, Crombie S, Smith J, Basu A, Colver A, et al. Understanding frames: A qualitative study of young people’s experiences of using standing frames as part of postural management for cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2018;44:203–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12540.
Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Paulo Rodrigues L. Motor Competence and its Effect on Positive Developmental Trajectories of Health Human Development (CIDESD) and Polytechnic Motor Competence and its Effect on Positive Developmental Trajectories of Health. vol. 36849. n.d.
Vasilopoulos F, Jeffrey H, Wu Y, Dumontheil I. Multi-Level Meta-Analysis of Physical Activity Interventions During Childhood: Effects of Physical Activity on Cognition and Academic Achievement. Educ Psychol Rev 2023;35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09760-2.
Suárez-Pellicioni M, Booth JR. Temporal cortex activation explains children’s improvement in math attitudes. Child Dev 2022;93:1012–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13749.
Cameron Ponitz CE, McClelland MM, Jewkes AM, Connor CMD, Farris CL, Morrison FJ. Touch your toes! Developing a direct measure of behavioral regulation in early childhood. Early Child Res Q 2008;23:141–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.01.004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdelrahman Ibrahim, Khalıd Jamal Mohammed, Ahmed Mahmood Mahdi, Tarik Dhayea mohammed, Mohammed Saad Jebur, Yasameen Fawzı Ghaeb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder - Author(s). more
Abstract views: 156 / PDF downloads: 2
