High-resolution three-dimensional biomechanical analysis and machine learning–based prediction of stroke length–stroke rate interaction in competitive freestyle swimming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2026.0502Keywords:
stroke length, stroke rate, swimming biomechanics, Machine learning, freestyle swimmingAbstract
Background and Study Aim. Competitive freestyle swimming performance is determined by the coordinated interaction of multiple biomechanical variables. Although stroke length and stroke rate are widely used to evaluate swimming technique and performance, their interaction in relation to swimming velocity remains a subject of practical interest. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between swimming velocity, stroke length, and stroke rate using high-resolution three-dimensional biomechanical analysis and to develop an interpretable predictive model. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional biomechanical study was conducted involving 40 competitive freestyle swimmers. Three-dimensional kinematic data were obtained using a Vicon motion capture system operating at 200 Hz. Regression modelling techniques, together with the XGBoost machine learning algorithm, were used to examine the interaction between stroke length and stroke rate and to predict swimming velocity. Results. The interaction between stroke length and stroke rate was a significant predictor of swimming velocity (β = 0.42, SE = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.26–0.58, p < 0.001). The nonlinear regression model explained a substantial proportion of the variance in swimming velocity (R² = 0.71; adjusted R² = 0.67). Conclusions. A nonlinear interaction between stroke length and stroke rate contributes to variations in competitive freestyle swimming performance. These findings suggest that optimizing the coordination between these biomechanical variables, rather than maximizing either variable independently, may enhance swimming performance.References
Lu J. Human Motion Detection in Swimming Motion Video Based on Multiscale Separation Spatio‐Temporal Attention Mechanism. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2025;2025(1): 3246852. https://doi.org/10.1155/abb/3246852
Fakher H, Badr E, Hassanein AM, Sweidan S. RTMPose and Ensemble Learning for Real-Time Swimmer Talent Detection. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 2025: 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-07336-5_17
Penichet-Tomas A. Applied Biomechanics in Sports Performance, Injury Prevention, and Rehabilitation. Applied Sciences, 2024;14(24): 11623. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142411623
Staunton CA, Ruiz-Navarro JJ, Born DP. Stroke rate–stroke length dynamics in elite freestyle swimming: application of kernel density estimation. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2025;7: 1656633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1656633
Seifert L, Carmigniani R. Coordination and stroking parameters in the four swimming techniques: a narrative review. Sports Biomechanics, 2021;22(12): 1617–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1959945
Morais JE, Barbosa TM, Nevill AM, Cobley S, Marinho DA. Understanding the Role of Propulsion in the Prediction of Front-Crawl Swimming Velocity and in the Relationship Between Stroke Frequency and Stroke Length. Frontiers in Physiology, 2022;13: 876838. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.876838
Nakazono Y, Shimojo H, Sengoku Y, Takagi H, Tsunokawa T. Impact of variations in swimming velocity on wake flow dynamics in human underwater undulatory swimming. Journal of Biomechanics, 2024;165: 112020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112020
Staunton CA, Romann M, Björklund G, Born DP. Streamlining performance prediction: data-driven KPIs in all swimming strokes. BMC Research Notes, 2024;17(1): 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-024-06714-x
Gao T, Chen X. Implementing machine learning algorithms to optimize sprint performance and biomechanical analysis of track and field athletes. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 2025;25(5): 4849–4861. https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251337990
Artificial Intelligence Approach in Biomechanics of Gait and Sport: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, 2023;13(5). https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2305-1621
Belova A, Rukina N, Kuznetsov A, Vorobyeva O. State-of-the-art possibilities of motion capture technologies in sport injuries research (review). Russian journal of biomechanics, 2022;26(2): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2022.2.07
Ghezelbash F, Hossein Eskandari A, Robert-Lachaine X, Cao S, Pesteie M, Qiao Z, et al. Machine learning applications in spine biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanics, 2024;166: 111967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111967
Stetter BJ, Stein T. Machine Learning in Biomechanics: Enhancing Human Movement Analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Sports, Movement, and Health, 2024: 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67256-9_9
Liew BX, Pfisterer F, Rügamer D, Zhai X. Strategies to optimise machine learning classification performance when using biomechanical features. Journal of Biomechanics, 2024;165: 111998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.111998
Jianjun Q, Isleem HF, Almoghayer WJK, Khishe M. Predictive athlete performance modeling with machine learning and biometric data integration. Scientific Reports, 2025;15(1): 16365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01438-9
Patil M, Goudar RH, Hukkeri GS. AI for swimming recommendation systems exploring the current landscape and research opportunities. Discover Applied Sciences, 2025;8(2): 156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-08156-x
Cao C, Liu X. Predicting sports injuries with machine learning technology: Enhancing athletes’ life expectancy through biomechanical analysis. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics, 2025;22(4): 1408. https://doi.org/10.62617/mcb1408
Calderón-Díaz M, Silvestre Aguirre R, Vásconez JP, Yáñez R, Roby M, Querales M, et al. Explainable Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Muscle Injuries in Professional Soccer Players through Biomechanical Analysis. Sensors, 2023;24(1): 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010119
Barbosa TM, Barbosa AC, Simbaña Escobar D, Mullen GJ, Cossor JM, Hodierne R, et al. The role of the biomechanics analyst in swimming training and competition analysis. Sports Biomechanics, 2021;22(12): 1734–1751. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1960417
Tri Fitrianto A, Barnanda Rizky O, Rahmadi E, Ramadhan A. A systematic literature review of swimming performance prediction: methods, datasets, techniques and research trends. Retos, 2025;67: 482–497. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.112197
Mehrabi AN, Imani H, Khademnoe O, Khantan M, Lundberg TR, Gorzi A. Modelling of performance prediction by analysis of elite swimmers’ anthropometry, peak performance age and age-related performance progression. PLOS One, 2025;20(9): e0332306. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332306
Bernardina GRD, de Andrade AGP, Monnet T, Cerveri P, Silvatti AP. Simultaneous in-air and underwater 3D kinematic analysis of swimmers: Feasibility and reliability of action sport cameras. Journal of Biomechanics, 2024;168: 112078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112078
Pinto MP, Neiva HP, Sampaio T, Oliveira JP, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, et al. The Associations Between the Swimming Speed, Anthropometrics, Kinematics, and Kinetics in the Butterfly Stroke. Bioengineering, 2025;12(8): 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12080797
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samer Mansoor Jameel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder - Author(s). more
Abstract views: 11 / PDF downloads: 4


