Bilateral asymmetry of pedaling force at different levels of exercise intensity in cycle ergometer




cycling, pedal force, bilateral asymmetry, asymmetry index, intensity


Background and Study Aim. To investigate how bilateral pedaling asymmetries change at exercises with different levels of intensity. Material and Methods. Eight students of cycling, average age 25.4 years, were investigated. In the experiment, we recorded the pedal force of the right and left legs during three consecutive exercises of different intensity 35%, 55% and 85% respectively.  To quantify the difference in physical parameters of pedaling between the left and right legs, we used two approaches that complement each other in the analysis of bilateral asymmetry. One approach involved determining an asymmetry index, and other was statistical analysis. Results. The Student's t-test indicated that the difference between the power samples for the left and right pedals decreased at 85% exercise intensity vs. 55% with a statistical significance of α = 0.05. The bilateral asymmetry in most cases decreased or in two cases remained unchanged. The cases where there was no statistically significant difference between the power samples for both legs at 85% and 55% intensity levels had the lowest asymmetry index. Conclusions. The bilateral pedaling asymmetry is reduced at 85% exercise intensity compared to the 55% one. The reduction in asymmetry index ranges from 1% to 14.1%, Combining the asymmetry index and the Student's t-test can increase the informativeness of pedaling power data when analyzing bilateral asymmetry.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lachezar G. Stefanov, National Sports Academy; National Sports Academy; Bulgaria.

Ivan Ivanov, National Sports Academy; Department of Technical and Ice Sports, National Sports Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Daniela Aleksieva, National Sports Academy; Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, National Sports Academy; Sofia, Bulgaria.


1. Bini R, Hume P, Crof J, Kilding A. Pedal force effectiveness in cycling: A review of constraints and training effects. Journal of Science and Cycling. 2013;2:11–24.

2. Sanderson DJ, Black A. The effect of prolonged cycling on pedal forces. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2003;21:191–9.

3. Too D. Biomechanics of Cycling and Factors Affecting Performance. Sports Medicine, 1990;10:286–302.

4. Bini RR, Jacques TC, Sperb CH, Lanferdini FJ, Vaz MA. Pedal force asymmetries and performance during a 20-km cycling time trial. Kinesiology (Zagreb, Online), 2016;48:193–9.

5. Carpes FP, Mota CB, Faria IE. On the bilateral asymmetry during running and cycling – A review considering leg preference. Physical Therapy in Sport, 2010;11:136–42.

6. Carpes FP, Rossato M, Mota CB, Faria IE. Bilateral Pedaling Asymmetry during a Simulated 40 km Cycling Time -Trial: 2206. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006;38:S394.

7. Diefenthaeler F, Berneira JDO, Moro VL, Carpes FP. Influence of saddle height and exercise intensity on pedalling asymmetries in cyclists. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum, 2016;18:411.

8. Smak W, Neptune RR, Hull ML. The influence of pedaling rate on bilateral asymmetry in cycling. Journal of Biomechanics, 1999;32:899–906.

9. Busko K. Power output and mechanical efficiency of human muscle in maximal cycle ergometer efforts at different pedalling rates. Biology of Sport. 2005;22: 35–51.

10. Dorel S, Hautier CA, Rambaud O, Rouffet D, Van Praagh E, Lacour J-R, et al. Torque and Power-Velocity Relationships in Cycling: Relevance to Track Sprint Performance in World-Class Cyclists. Int J Sports Med, 2005;26:739–46.

11. Kautz SA, Hull ML. A theoretical basis for interpreting the force applied to the pedal in cycling. Journal of Biomechanics, 1993;26:155–65.

12. Bini R. Relationship between pedal force asymmetry and performance in cycling time trial. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness. 2015;55: 1–2.

13. Rannama I, Port K. Bilateral Biomechanical Asymmetry During 30 Seconds Isokinetic Sprint-Cycling Exercise. LASE Journal of Sport Science, 2015;6:1–14.

14. Bini RR, Hume PA. Assessment of Bilateral Asymmetry in Cycling Using a Commercial Instrumented Crank System and Instrumented Pedals. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2014;9:876–81.

15. Gardner AS, Martin JC, Martin DT, Barras M, Jenkins DG. Maximal torque- and power-pedaling rate relationships for elite sprint cyclists in laboratory and field tests. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2007;101:287–92.

16. Liu T, Jensen JL. Age-Related Differences in Bilateral Asymmetry in Cycling Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2012;83:114–9.

17. van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS ONE, 2017;12:e0189876.

18. Stefanov LG. Wireless cycle power-meter system with load cell. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2016;7, 805–809.

19. Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001;37:153–6.

20. Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, Després J-P, Dishman RK, Franklin BA, et al. ACSM Position Stand: The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy Adults. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1998;30:975–91.

21. Pallarés JG, Lillo-Bevia JR. Validity and Reliability of the PowerTap P1 Pedals Power Meter. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2018;17, 305–311




How to Cite

Stefanov LG, Ivanov I, Aleksieva D. Bilateral asymmetry of pedaling force at different levels of exercise intensity in cycle ergometer. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2020;24(5):264-70.

Abstract views: 404 / PDF downloads: 334