A study on the key predictors of 100m sprint performance: identification and ranking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2025.0208

Keywords:

sports performance, selection model, predictive factors, young athletes, anthropometric characteristic

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The sprint is one of the most prestigious events in athletics, requiring a combination of explosive power and acceleration. However, talent identification remains a challenge, as early sprint performance does not always predict long-term success. The aim of this study is to identify and rank the most relevant predictors of 100m sprint performance among young athletes. Material and Methods. This study involved 11 subjects (6 boys and 5 girls) born in 2008, who were in their first year of the U18 category in 2024. They participated in the 100m event both in 2023 and 2024. Speed, strength, coordination, and mobility were assessed using tests, including 30m sprint from a standing start, 60m sprint from a standing start, 30m sprint with a flying start, bounding strides over 30m, standing long jump, triple jump, countermovement jump, medicine ball throw, and Sit and Reach test. Specific agility was evaluated using the Witty SEM system. Balance parameters and lower limb strength were assessed with the SensaBalance platform and the OptoJump system, respectively. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson’s correlation, Spearman’s rank correlation, and Bootstrapped Pearson’s correlation to identify the most relevant predictors. The bootstrapping technique was applied to enhance the reliability of the correlation estimates. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results. The analysis revealed that not all of the 12 assessed tests had significant predictive value for sprint performance. Parameters such as specific agility, static and dynamic balance, squat jump, and Sit and Reach mobility test did not show strong correlations with 100m sprint outcomes. These findings support the use of selected physical and anthropometric variables in a secondary selection model for young sprinters. Conclusions. This study confirms that specific physical, psychomotor, and anthropometric variables significantly influence 100m sprint performance among young athletes. It also proposes a secondary selection model that incorporates the most relevant predictors to support talent identification and training optimization.

Author Biographies

Alina Ionela Predescu, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest

ali_predescu@yahoo.com; Doctoral School of Sports Science and Physical Education, Pitesti University Center; Pitesti, Romania.

Liliana Niculina Mihăilescu, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest

Professor Dr.; lilimih2003@yahoo.com; Doctoral School of Sports Science and Physical Education, Pitesti University Center; Pitesti, Romania.

Luminița Georgescu, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest

Professor Dr; kinetopit@yahoo.com; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Pitesti University Center; Pitesti, Romania.  

Aurelia Cristina Macri, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest

Associate Professor Dr.; auramacri@yahoo.com; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Pitesti University Center; Pitesti, Romania.  

Alexandrina Mihaela Constantin, Valahia University of Targoviste

Associate Professor Dr.; simona159@yahoo.com; Faculty of Humanities, Department of Physical Education and Sport; Dambovita, Romania.  

Ilie Mihai, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest

Associate Professor Dr.; ilie112004@yahoo.com; Department of Physical Education and Sport, Pitesti University Center; Pitesti, Romania.  

References

Maćkała K, Fostiak M, Kowalski K. Selected Determinants of Acceleration in the 100m Sprint. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2015;45(1): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0014

Morin JB, Bourdin M, Edouard P, Peyrot N, Samozino P, Lacour JR. Mechanical determinants of 100-m sprint running performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2012;112(11): 3921–3930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2379-8

Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, Wright S. Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2000;89(5): 1991–1999. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1991

Baguet A, Everaert I, Hespel P, Petrovic M, Achten E, Derave W. A New Method for Non-Invasive Estimation of Human Muscle Fiber Type Composition. Blanc S (ed.) PLoS ONE, 2011;6(7): e21956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021956

Gollnick PD, Matoba H. The muscle fiber composition of skeletal muscle as a predictor of athletic success: An overview. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1984;12(3): 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658401200309

Hirvonen J, Rehunen S, Rusko H, Härkönen M. Breakdown of high-energy phosphate compounds and lactate accumulation during short supramaximal exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 1987;56(3): 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00690889

Watts AS, Coleman I, Nevill A. The changing shape characteristics associated with success in world-class sprinters. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2012;30(11): 1085–1095. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.588957

Weyand PG, Davis JA. Running performance has a structural basis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2005;208(14): 2625–2631. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01609

Van Ingen Schenau GJ, De Koning JJ, De Groot G. Optimisation of Sprinting Performance in Running, Cycling and Speed Skating: Sports Medicine, 1994;17(4): 259–275. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199417040-00006

Romanian Athletics Federation. REZULTATE 2024 [RESULTS 2024]. [Internet]. 2024 [updated 2024 Jun; cited 2024 Sep 28]. Available from: https://www.fra.ro/rezultate/arhiva-rezultate/rezultate-2024 (In Romanian).

Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2018;126(5): 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Laerd Statistics. Pearson's Product-Moment Correlation using SPSS Statistics [Internet]. 2024 [updated 2024 Jun; cited 2024 Sep 28]. Available from:

Valamatos MJ, Abrantes JM, Carnide F, Valamatos MJ, Monteiro CP. Biomechanical Performance Factors in the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022;19(7): 4074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074074

Bergamini E. Biomechanics of sprint running: a methodological contribution. Bologna University; 2011.

Healy R, Kenny IC, Harrison AJ. Profiling elite male 100-m sprint performance: The role of maximum velocity and relative acceleration. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2022;11(1): 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2019.10.002

Haugen T, Seiler S, Sandbakk Ø, Tønnessen E. The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature. Sports Medicine - Open, 2019;5(1): 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-019-0221-0

Jorim Holtey-Weber. Talent Development in Sports and Beyond. 2015. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35783.55208

Papic V, Rogulj N, Plesti V. Expert System for Identification of Sport Talents: Idea, Implementation and Results. In: Vizureanu P (ed.) Expert Systems for Human, Materials and Automation, InTech; 2011. https://doi.org/10.5772/19203

Lee SSM, Piazza SJ. Built for speed: musculoskeletal structure and sprinting ability. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2009;212(22): 3700–3707. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.031096

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Predescu AI, Mihăilescu LN, Georgescu L, Macri AC, Constantin AM, Mihai I. A study on the key predictors of 100m sprint performance: identification and ranking. Pedagogy of Physical Culture and Sports. 2025;29(2):142-50. https://doi.org/10.15561/26649837.2025.0208
Statistics

Abstract views: 1654 / PDF downloads: 1531

Most read articles by the same author(s)